sitesmithscott:This goes with "Ignorance is Bliss" which I have begun to believe. Knowledge is a burden for once you know, you will always know. To not know means you don't have to worry about something or regret because you know no different.
Only true from a single perspective, the person who is ignorant. But the person who is ignorant cannot neccessarily classify themself as blissful, if they don't realize that the system that they are living in is cheating them, that their life is merely an illusion of the ruling class, so that the ignorant working bums will continue their mindless servitude till the end of time. No, being ignorant does not make one blissful, and yet, the opposing sentiment is neither true. Knowledge rarely brings greater happiness, yet at the same time you cannot truly be happy without knowing something about what's going on. If you are completely "ignorant" one must assume you are not aware, and because of that, you cannot be happy. Happiness is a state of existence which perpetuates a feeling of bliss, and if true bliss is unachievable without knowledge, while knowledge in and of itself brings some sort of pain, isn't that ironic?
Ironic, yet paradoxically true. Pain and pleasure are often intermingled, for if you look at nearly any happy event there is some sort of carthargic pain involved. A purge of things unneeded, of some sort. In any case, I follow a far more specific philosohpy: enlightenment would be the entirety of knowledge, and since enlightenment means that one shall be removed from the burdens of actual desire (according to Buddhist precepts - desire brings pain), then in and of itself only a truly enlightened person (who is not ignorant) is happy.
Lets all be Buddhists.
"... if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for Destruction Ice is also great
And would suffice."
- Robert Frost