Comics, Art, and Fun!
Welcome to WCN Sign in | Join | Help
in
Home Top WebComics Blogs Forums Photos Links Downloads

Movie Critic Corner

Last post 08-24-2007, 5:12 PM by VkmSpouge. 503 replies.
Page 29 of 34 (504 items)   « First ... < Previous 27 28 29 30 31 Next > ... Last »
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  1/7/2006 6:20:16 AM 765055 in reply to 765016

    Re: Movie Critic Corner

    I've seen Spirited Away and I thought it was very good and very enjoyable, though one or two parts I found confusing it still was a very good film.
    Scratchit: But he's a cripple!
    Blackadder: He's not a cripple, Mrs Scratchit. Occasionally saying "Phew! My leg hurts!" when he remembers to wouldn't fool Baldrick!

  •  1/7/2006 10:25:22 AM 765068 in reply to 499223

    Re: Movie Critic Corner

    A lot of animes can have very confusing moments.

    Princess Mononoke is much more straight forward in my opinion, if you havent seen it, I highly recommend it
    If at first you dont succeed, dont try skydiving
    Both diapers and politicians need to be changed--and usually for the same reasons
  •  1/17/2006 4:29:02 PM 765686 in reply to 499223

    Re: Movie Critic Corner

    Hey I just heard some great news, especially for Twitch, Kayless, and Popo who all saw the movie--Sin City is apparently about to have a sequel in production, so apparently the popularity of the film has helped it turn into a franchise.

    I still have yet to see it, but I plan on it.

    Ill also have reviews for Castle in the Sky, Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind, Troll 2, and/or Hidalgo made if anybody is interested
    If at first you dont succeed, dont try skydiving
    Both diapers and politicians need to be changed--and usually for the same reasons
  •  1/18/2006 1:41:41 PM 765754 in reply to 763976

    Re: Movie Critic Corner

    Old School (15)
    I saw this movie on Christmas Day after the Doctor Who episode. My brother had bought me the DVD as a present so we watched it. It's mostly a teen comedy flick with the twist that the three main characters are in fact 30-something year-old men. The plot revolves around,  Mitch (Luke Wilson) who has recently been divorced moving into a new house near a college campus (the college also own the house). When the college decide to make the house for college use only Mitch faces eviction until his best friend Beanie (Vince Vaughn) comes up with a plan to allow Mitch to stay in the house, start a college fraternity.
    Well clearly the movie was never going to be among the greats but it does provide a few laughs. You won't need your brain for this but it is enjoyable. The start was a bit slow and I was bored for the first half an hour but it got better after that. Acting could have been better but it didn't really detract from the film.
    Rating: 5/10

    Jarhead
    (15)
    Saw this movie yesterday and was quite impressed. It's set in Gulf War I and follows a group of US Marines (nicknamed Jarheads) as they prepare for Operation: Desert Storm. It shows the psychological effects of the stress of war on these marines as they spend their time in the desert bored out of their minds. Eventually war is declared and the Marines lead the ground attack.
    This is certainly not your standard war movie with very little combat at all. The film's weight is carried by the lead character Swoff (Jake Gyllenhaal) who narates the story. You see him come in as a fresh recruit, as the story progresses you do see him change as things take their toll. Gyllenhaal is aptly supported by the rest of the cast including a very good performance by Jamie Foxx as hard as nails Staff Sergeant Sykes. I enjoyed this film and I think you should go and see it.
    Rating: 8/10

    Scratchit: But he's a cripple!
    Blackadder: He's not a cripple, Mrs Scratchit. Occasionally saying "Phew! My leg hurts!" when he remembers to wouldn't fool Baldrick!

  •  1/22/2006 11:29:10 PM 766081 in reply to 763904

    Re: Movie Critic Corner

     VkmSpouge wrote:
    Fantastic Four

    Now I can't remember whether the film has been reviewed or not but I'll do a small review anyway. 5 people go into space, get zapped by cosmic radiation that fundamentally alters their DNA (as those chimps they sent into space will testify, this does actually happen). One of the 5 goes evil and the other 4 have to stop him. Nice simple plot, little complication. I enjoyed the film, it had some good jokes and humour in it. The acting was alright, I couldn't help comparing Ioan Gruffudd's Mr Fantastic to his Horatio Hornblower (a good TV series), I felt he wasn't quite at his best but me not being a comic buff wouldn't know what Mr Fantastic is meant to be like so for all I know Gruffudd played it perfectly. 92 minutes of good entertainment, not on the same level as either of the two Spiderman movies but still pretty decent and worth watching.

    I hate Fantastic Four. Angry [:@]  It's probably the first of the recent Marvel movies that I have actively disliked. Like most Marvel flicks it has a couple inspired casting choices and a couple roles that are totally miscast.  Chris Evans is great as Johnny "Human Torch" Storm and Michael Chiklis is perfect as Ben "Thing" Grimm, but Jessica Alba, Ioan Gruffud and Julian McMahon are just wrong for their parts (as Sue "Invisible Girl" Storm, Reed "Mr. Fantastic" Richards and Doctor Doom, respectively). I've got nothing against these actors, but they're as wrong for their parts as say, Halle Berry is for the role of Storm in the X-Men series (at best they're bland). The biggest problem is that they're all too young. Someone like John Glover (a character actor best known for his role as Lex's father in Smallville) would have been better as Mr. Fantastic. Nicole Kidman or some other 30 or 40 something actress would have been better as Sue as well. I also think they should have gone the Darth Vader route with Doom (i.e. have one actor in the suit, another providing the voice). Anthony Hopkins would have been awesome as the voice of Doom (who is supposed to be a calculating dictator, not a venal corporate snob). Getting back to Michael Chiklis for a moment, would it have killed them to give him a wig for his human scenes? Stick out tongue [:P] Ben Grimm had hair dagnabbit (and I've seen movies with Chiklis wearing a rug; he looks good in one). And speaking of hair, why doesn't Johnny have blonde hair? There's a line in the movie about him having golden hair, but Chris Evans has brown hair. Indifferent [:|]

    Fanboy b!tching over changes from the comic isn't my only reason for disliking Fantastic Four the movie. The Thing looks terrible. I don't know if CGI would have been better, but they could have at least made the suit look a little more real.  I liked Chiklis' performance (though he should drop his Thing voice and just talk normal) but the suit was distracting. Plot-wise the whole movie seems like it's spinning its wheels in place. Nothing really happens until the very end. The whole movie should have been compressed into the first two acts. There are a lot of gaffs in logic too (why are the Fantastic Four public darlings?  They caused the big accident that they had to save people from). One talkbacker on AICN said it best: "I downloaded this for free off the internet and I still feel ripped off." *Sigh*  They can still salvage this series, but it's going to take a lot of work. 

    Fantastic Four gets a 3 out of 10 on the Kayless-O-Meter.


    Dungeon Crawl Inc. - It's the most fun you can have without three midgets and a whip!
  •  1/23/2006 8:41:18 AM 766116 in reply to 766081

    Re: Movie Critic Corner

    I never saw it, but I saw the trailer, and out of it I could pretty much tell the same things as Kayless
    the thing looked too plastic, in my oppinion... or rubber-ish perhaps

    I think two of the better marvelfilms were Spiderman and sequal, despite I as a spiderman-nerd constantly got annoyed by all the stuff that was wrong, like him shooting web out of his wrists, not using an invention (I mean, not having enough web-goo was a constant problem for him in the comics, duh), I still found them good, sort of like the god ol' Batman films, not like the comics, but totally working
    pretty much the same with X-men, though I didn't really think Halle Berry did storm that bad.
    sure, maybe they could've taken someone with a bit more powerful voice and stronger personality, but it didn't really bother me
    BORK!
  •  1/23/2006 1:11:04 PM 766138 in reply to 499223

    Re: Movie Critic Corner

    Well I, like some of you, love to hear some of these reports that rip apart movies, because Im sadistic sometimes ;)

    First off, Kayless, glad you liked Evans in that role--He had my dad for 8th grade english! :D Something I was very excited to learn about a few days ago.

    Secondly, I actually havent seen this movie, but from what you say and what Ive heard from others its very Hollywoodish in its production and very empty other than the effects they put into it. It just seems they wanted to make some money off of a quiet franchise. I can see them doing the same thing to Ironman.

    There are good superhero movies out there and I really enjoy them when theyre good (Like Spiderman 2 for instance), but otherwise theyre just candy thats good for a couple hours with nothing redeeming in them. Shame, because when theyre like that, they arent even worth watching a 2nd time...
    If at first you dont succeed, dont try skydiving
    Both diapers and politicians need to be changed--and usually for the same reasons
  •  1/27/2006 2:21:30 PM 766449 in reply to 766138

    Re: Movie Critic Corner

    Well all month a cable channel did a tribute to Japanese artist Hayao Miyazaki, I manged to catch all the films they aired on him, which is almost the complete collection except for Kiki's Delivery Service, Castle Cogliastro and Howl's Moving Castle. I already reviewed Spirted Away and Princess Mononoke but here are the rest in bulk. Read as many or as few as you want.  I was just bored and thought Id write up some reviews for anybody who would want to read them.  Thanks

    Ill review them in the order I saw them

    First up:

    Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind (1984) (PG)



    The general plot follows a princess of a small village in the post apocalyptic area (Nausicaa) after she deals with the poisonous forest and unfriendly neighbor peoples who's lands are in trouble from the expanding poisons of the forests. These lands of poisons have only plants and insects who have evolved in order to adapt to these harsh conditions. Humans, like Nausicaa and the neighboring cities cannot inhale the air or live off the food of these forests. These people of the cities in peril want to conquer or destroy the Valley of the Wind for their own exploits.

    OK the art for this film is probably at its most crude for Miyazaki, but even then its still a masterpiece to look at. So let me talk about the artwork first. The scenery of the Valley of the Wind is brought into near reality sometimes. It really feels tranquil especially with the windmills and the hilltops right nearby. It seems like a paradise surrounded by nothing but perril. The few scenes that are in the forest are also amazing. The only scenery I didnt like was towards the end of the movie when it did get rather dark.

    The characters were adequate. Nausicaa steals the film easily and everyone else, while sometimes major, is simply in the background. Like many Miyazaki films, the villains in the plot arent totally villianous and arent rotten to the core, but they do do bad things which cause them to be the antagonists. Though you really do see the depth in a couple of them by the end, turning antagonists into protagonists, which is brilliant. But some of the characters are one dimensional.


    As far as the plot, its decent. A little too sci fi for me at times, but I do like the ideas it presents. I really didnt care for the ohm too much though. Not really that interesting a creature, not really that well concieved. While the plot is usually the most important thing, just because I didnt like pieces of it doesnt mean I didnt like the movie. I did like it, and I do recommend it.  And good lord, I actually shed a tear in this movie!

    8 out of 10

    -----------------

    Castle in the Sky (1986) (Unrated)



    The plot starts out with Sheeta who has been abducted for unexplained reasons at this point in an airship. Sky pirates attack the ship and she tries to escape but falls. However her neclace inexplicably glows and causes her to softly drift to the ground where an unsuspecting boy, Pazu, sees her. She never saw any of this, though because she fainted from the initial fall. Pazu takes her into his house where she eventually wakes up...very confused. They talk about the myth of a floating castle in the sky which they both would have interest in as the plot goes on. Meanwhile, Sky Pirates and Government agents (who initially kidnapped her) are trying to recapture her for her neclace, which has more power than they originally thought.

    Wow, lots of great stuff to be said about this movie. The scenery in this film easily rivals any of Miyazaki's films, which is incredible on its own as this film was created...well 3 years after I was born. There is a lot of scenes you can just sit and gaze in awe about here, but dont stand in awe too long as this film is a BIG adventure and very fast paced, probably the most adventurous and most fast paced than any other Miyazaki film.  This aspect makes it both more and less appealing than other Miyazaki films, which can have the foundation of simply beauty and character depth to carry the movie, and all while being patiently and beautifully done films.  This film isnt all that patient, and there arent too many scenes that really stare at the beauty or wait for the audience to feel the depth of the scenes.  This film is non-stop action from story development and character development.  But even with this, we still get to know the characters and we can still see the characters develop, and they are developed so well in this film.

    This film isnt as complex as other Miyazaki films either, and the major villain of the film (voiced by Mark Hamill in the English version) is truly a villain to the core.  This is perhaps the only real weakness this film has in comparison to other Miyazaki's works.  That said, it doesnt really detract from any of the story, and every bit of it is magnificent and beautiful.  This film EASILY ranks among my favorites and ranks somewhere in my personal top 10 favorite films

    10 out of 10

    -------------------

    My Neighbor Totoro (1988) (G)



    The plot follows two young girls as they move into a new home in the countryside with their  father.  The fantasy of this world is almost immediately apparent as the house is infested (though not in a negative way) by dust spirits (who make appearances in Spirited Away), who crave the dark but will scatter away as soon as light hits them.  The younger sister starts investigating the nearby woods and discovered there is a forest spirit living there, Totoro.  Totoro is friendly and inviting towards the young girl.  They become friends.  Later the older sister (still young) also discovers Totoro once Totoro is ready to meet her, and Totoro can only be seen by those who he chooses to see.  The other side of the plot follows their mother who is sick in the hospital and both girls desperately want to see her.

    You want to talk about a great movie for a child to see.  This is definitely a children's film through and through and unless their heart has grown cold already, they should fully enjoy this film.  This film breaks almost every precidence set by most films.  There is no antagonist...at all.  There isnt any malice that needs to be cleared up and the only problem that is ever presented to us is their sick mother, who isnt even in dire trouble, rather she is just experiencing a tough sickness and isnt quite well enough to be mobile.  And the father is completely accepting of the girls' stories about Totoro even if he cant see him, himself.  In almost every film youd see, given this situation, the father would either say their imagination is out of control or hed punish them for lying.  Rather he accepts the spirit and thanks him for being friendly.  This movie thinks outside the box, and that I compliment.  The scenery once again is magnificent.  The fanstasy world mixed in with reality is a terrific blend.

    But...this film probably wouldnt appeal to everyone because of its very different creation and thought process.  And its also very much of a G rated film, if ever there was one.  The film is very slow paced and it never ever leaves the land of innocence.  Usually in plots theres a point where you can never return to the point of innocence.  This film never leaves!  So just be warned about that.  But this film has a true heart, its very warm and its inviting to many.  Its just if this isnt your style of film it will never take you anywhere you want it to go.  And I dont believe Id be its target audience, so it didnt appeal to me as much as others.  I still recommend it, but with a buyer beware.

    7 out of 10
    -------------------
    Porco Rosso (1992) (PG)



    The plot follows a bounty hunter of the early age of flying in Italy, circa 1920s.  Only this bounty hunter has been cursed with the head of a pig--his name, Porco Rosso.  Yes I know, how weird!  But youll get over that fast.  He is a terrific bounty hunter pilot ruling the skies and he easily disposes of sky pirates....until an American comes over and challenges him and shoots his plane down.  He survives but must go over to Malta to fix his plane, where he meets an upstart plane technician, who also happens to be a teenage girl.  Rosso may not see eye to eye with her, but he soon learns she has the talent to make his plane better.  Rosso struggles in thought between finding more money, revenge and just trying to make a living.

    If Castle in the Sky appealed to you, then this film is right up your alley.  Again another very big adventure film that can take the worlds of striking scenery and exciting plot and get the best out of them.  Its odd, the plot starts out as a real adventure ride of Porco Rosso and the sky pirates, but by the end of the film, it becomes really a character study, and even if this film has nearly as much action as Castle in the Sky, it has a tremendous amount of character depth and development.  And the sky scenes were just awesome.  There was no way you could turn away from the action and beauty of them. 

    I absolutely loved the plot, with only a couple of shortcomings in a couple places.  I think there were a couple side characters that this film didnt really need, but I liked Porco Rosso, the American pilot and the teenage plane technician, and since theyre the 3 principal characters in the film, the fact other characters were weak in the plot didnt drag this film down much at all.  I could have seen more and more of this film and it wouldnt have gotten old.  I wish there was more!

    Probably my 3rd favorite Miyazaki film after Castle in the Sky and Princess Mononoke

    9 out of 10

    ----------------------

    Whisper of the Heart (1995) (G)



    The plot starts out with a girl who loves to read discovering a boy has signed out all the same library books she has.  She has become bored with her everyday life and seeks adventure.  The plot follows her in her everyday life, from her home and her school and friends and family.  She eventually encounters an antique shop with several inspiring artifacts and meets a violin maker who she eventually falls in love with, of course who also signed out all the books she did.

    This film wasnt directed by Miyazaki, but it was produced by Miyazaki so it counts in the grand scheme of his films.  This was directed by Miyazaki's protige who sadly died shortly after the creation of this film.  And judging by the plot I basically gave a rough glance in that little paragraph, you can tell its a different type of story than the others.  This film has little fantasy involved in the plot at all, rather the plot is far more realistic, and it could have easily been done in live action instead of anime.  But theres some sort of untouchable quality about anime done this way that is more touching than it would have been had it not been anime, which is certainly weird because youd think real people would be able to be more touching.  Not the case, I dont think here. 
    Whisper of the Heart is a touching very quiet adventure about people rather than fantasy.  So again, I dont know if or how this would appeal to just about everyone.  It certainly is more ordinary than the other films Ive talked about.  But I dont know, I still liked this film to a point.  It never really swept me off my feet but the characters were real and the emotion they felt could be felt by me, the audience.  So in that aspect its very nice.  And the scenery here was perhaps among the most beautiful of any of the films here, despite it having a very ordinary setting.

    Again, buyer beware, and again its a film with a soul.  Its also eye candy.  The plot had a couple weak points but no real major complaints.  They may have jumped the gun a little bit at the end, but I wont divulge information there.

    8 out of 10

    ------------------------

    Only Yesterday (1991) (Unrated)



    The plot follows an woman about to take a much needed and desired vacation to the countryside to do manual labor in fields that farm dye products.  In her journey she reminsices about her childhood in scenes that have effected her as an adult.  Plots follow her ways of life in both worlds, her attitudes in both worlds and her love life in both worlds and where they are parrallel or perpendicular to each other.

    This film is also executive produced by Miyazaki and not directed by him.  This film is comparable to Whisper of the Heart, but it is very different in the same style.  Once again, this film too could have been easily done in live action, but I think it would have lost a lot of its charm by doing it.  What this film would live and die on would be the flashback technique from her early life to her current life.  I think in the end, they did it well enough to appease me.  Sometimes certain flashbacks seemed out of place but they never seemed to detract from the story and they never annoyed me about their placement in the story.  I really liked it when both worlds were combined through her imagination. 

    The characters in the film, while not weak, werent as dynamic as others Ive reviewed in this thread.  The main character's character was extremely well done, and her modern crush was also done well, but everyone else seemed rather 1 dimensional, which is very odd for me to say in this post as just about all the characters Ive discussed here have been very deep.  The plot was heartwarming and cold at the same time, sometimes, which gave the film, itself, some depth.

    Not the most intriguing film, and it didnt stand out a whole lot, but it was still good

    6 out of 10

    -----------------------

    Pom Poko (1994) (PG)



    The plot follows raccoons who have the ability to shapeshift, only foxes and raccoons on earth have the power to shapeshift.  Their livelihood is being encroached by urban sprawl in Tokyo.  The raccoons must train their arts of shapeshifting to both fool and scare away the people who are continually chopping down  their forest so they can live in peace again.

    Another film that Miyazaki didnt direct but produced.

    OK, here Im thinking, "All Right!  Raccoons are the heroes AND the movie has an awesome message about the negatives of urban sprawl and forest encroachment!"  So the film has already gotten on my good side, and yes the premise of raccoons being shapeshifters is a little absurd and off the wall, but Ill be happy to play along with that, as long as its well done.  Well I fully enjoyed the first half of the film, which while it wasnt living up to all my expectations, was still very enjoyable, funny, thought provoking and somewhat nice to look at.  I wasnt sold on the shapeshifting idea and I really didnt care much for the forms the raccoons took when away from humans.  But that was ok, I can live with that.  But the second half, I couldnt think of one thing they were actually doing RIGHT except for a few minutes towards the very end of the film, which only slightly made up for the complete failure of the 2nd hour.

    The 2nd hour was incredibly disjointed, it stopped making sense and the plot was going in all the wrong directions.  It lost me even after all the good things it was doing in the first half AND the message the film had.  The film also stopped being humerous, so it was changing its face too fast and too badly.  The climax was pointless and disjointed and what followed that was just an exhale of whatever energy they didnt waste in putting the film in production.  It really dropped the ball, which is sad.  The characters were ok, but nothing special.  Ah yes and perhaps they were a little too visual with the male raccoon's anatomy...do we really have to see that in a cartoon?

    When the 2nd half failed as badly as it did, there was just no way this film would be able to recover and I am forced to say I dont recommend this film.  No reason to see this when there are so many other films worthy of attention

    3 out of 10

    If at first you dont succeed, dont try skydiving
    Both diapers and politicians need to be changed--and usually for the same reasons
  •  1/30/2006 7:21:25 PM 766633 in reply to 766449

    Re: Movie Critic Corner

     Tybaltus wrote:
    Well all month a cable channel did a tribute to Japanese artist Hayao Miyazaki, I manged to catch all the films they aired on him, which is almost the complete collection except for Kiki's Delivery Service, Castle Cogliastro and Howl's Moving Castle. I already reviewed Spirted Away and Princess Mononoke but here are the rest in bulk. Read as many or as few as you want.  I was just bored and thought Id write up some reviews for anybody who would want to read them.  Thanks.

    I caught some of these myself (namely Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind, Castle in the Sky, and Pom Poko). Miyazaki has a wonderfully visual imagination. I really enjoyed the first two films (especially hearing Mark Hamil in Castle in the Sky) but Pom Poko was a little weird.  Of course that's because the shape-shifting raccoons (Tanuki) and indeed much of the movie is based on Japanese folklore. For a westerner like myself it didn't really resonate. Still, like all of Miyazaki's films, it has its moments.


    Dungeon Crawl Inc. - It's the most fun you can have without three midgets and a whip!
  •  1/30/2006 7:55:55 PM 766636 in reply to 766633

    Re: Movie Critic Corner

    Aha! Thanks for that bit of input there, Kayless. That changes my perception somewhat of the Pom Poko film, at least it makes it far less bizarre, but it still doesnt change my opinion of how awkward the film is by itself. Ignoring the whole plot of shapeshifting, and you still have a somewhat disjointed movie that loses what it had in the first half.

    I am glad you liked the first 2 films though, and youre right, these films live on imagination--heck thats ALL that My Neighbor Totoro has to offer and it flies on it.
    If at first you dont succeed, dont try skydiving
    Both diapers and politicians need to be changed--and usually for the same reasons
  •  2/1/2006 9:51:38 AM 766734 in reply to 766636

    Re: Movie Critic Corner

    Well suddenly I have a huge 4 hour block of time to eat up on Mondays and Wednesdays, so its time to kill. 

    A couple other movies Ive seen in recent weeks to kill some time:

    Hidalgo (PG-13) (2004)

    The general plot follows Frank Hopkins (Viggo Mortenson), a half cowboy half native american horse rider.  He is incredibly talented rider and his horse, Hidalgo, is even more talented a horse.  After doing some side shows in the States, Hopkins decides to enter his horse in a great middle eastern horse race whose destination resides at Damascus.  Some people despise an outsider taking part in the greatest horse race in the world and most presitigous.  Others have no opinion, he simply is another rider in the race.  But some want to sabotage his race so that he has no chance in winning.  All the meanwhile there is a power struggle regarding the man behind the race and another rider seeking to steal the fastest horse in the race.

    The setting for this film is gorgeous.  And the special effects are icing on the cake.  But of course with almost 75% of the films that take place in deserts, theres a ton of money that is thrown at the movie in order to properly make the setting.  So its very risky.  And often there are other things that suffer in these films.  Sadly, Hidalgo doesnt change that.  Hidalgo brings a lot to the table but not much of it is fulfulling.  There is a film to be had here, and there is something that can be enjoyed in it, but there is a lot of downtime too that turned me off.

    Let me talk about the plot.  This film starts off slower than a snail in molasses.  If you manage to still be awake 45 minutes into this seemingly excruciatingly long film (though 2 hours and 10 minutes isnt awful, it feels like more) then youll be rewarded with the actual race, which SHOULD have been what this film would live or die on.   Gladly the race scenes in this film were very good and the action scenes sewing them together were even better.  Had the film focused purely on the race and didnt throw so much into plot backlines and needless dramatic face shots, then they really would have been on the right track to a good movie or better.

    But the race scenes werent everything in this film and what should have been a fast paced adventure slows to the pace of a donkey in this horse race. 

    5 out of 10

    ----------------

    Grave of the Fireflies (Unrated) (1988)

    The plot follows two children (Seita, 14, and Setsuko, 4) after their home had been bombed by an American Air Raid in Kobe, Japan, World War II.  Their mother was killed in the bombing and their father was killed when serving for the Japanese Navy.  They find a home with their aunt, who doesnt like them because they become liabilities and eat too much food from her food supply.  They either have the decision to stay with the evil aunt or go off on their own.

    This film was done by Studio Ghibli, but not a Miyazaki film in any form, and you can tell.  Miyazaki deals with friendly films.  This film is far from friendly.  It is an emotionally crushing film about these poor kids.  Its based on an autobiography about a boy who, with his sister, goes through the same storyline.  But it doesnt follow it step by step and the fate of the kids in the movie is different than the fate of the author of the autobiography. 

    This film deals with the horrors of outsiders caught up in war, about family destruction from war, about those too young to be experiencing something of far more gravity than they should ever face and about general survival in an all too cruel world.  If this plot is something that you wouldnt find appealing as far as watching, then Id suggest not picking this film up.  And certainly if you really want to avoid a tough feeling in your gut because of the gravity of the film, Id also stay away from it.  If this stuff is of interest to you, and you do want to hear the tale, then I dont think I need to say more about it.  But I still will.

    The film isnt as visually attractive as Miyazaki's work--its not as glossy or detailed as Miyazaki's artwork, its a bit rough around the edges, but its still a sight to see.  Its still beautiful, however beautiful you can get in this context.  The plot can sometimes a bit slow paced for me, and on a couple of occasions it became slightly disjointed or certain cut scenes made little sense to me.  That doesnt stop me from taking this film for what it is, and its a tragic tale--told magically. 

    I think this film could have been so much more, but for what it does bring, it still left me a haunting feeling, a very sad feeling that, while I didnt cry, I did feel something welling up inside my being.  So I am going to recommend this film.  Its not violent aside from the war aspect, but it may be just a bit too sad for kids to see.

    8 out of 10

     


    If at first you dont succeed, dont try skydiving
    Both diapers and politicians need to be changed--and usually for the same reasons
  •  2/2/2006 12:20:23 PM 766829 in reply to 766734

    Re: Movie Critic Corner

    seriously tybaltus, you spend too much time watching films... count the films reviewed here, and then count the number of them reviewed by you

    ^^
    BORK!
  •  2/2/2006 12:26:21 PM 766830 in reply to 499223

    Re: Movie Critic Corner

    I stocked up over the month vacation I just had. Now that Im back to classes, I probably wont see a movie for quite some time. Maybe 1 or 2 over the course of the next few months

    And there are still tons of movies I would love to see. In the end I dont figure I watch many more movies than most people. I know people who watch 2 or 3 films a week which is far more than I do.

    Dont think Im being defensive here either. This post kinda sounds that way, but Im not. Just want to make that clear. So dont think Im upset that you said that ;)
    If at first you dont succeed, dont try skydiving
    Both diapers and politicians need to be changed--and usually for the same reasons
  •  2/2/2006 12:49:59 PM 766834 in reply to 499223

    Re: Movie Critic Corner

    But you see the world needs people like Tybaltus to watch movies like he does. I on the other hand may watch 1 or 2 movies per year. So someone has to balance that out.
    H-here, b-bunny, bunny, bunny...


  •  2/6/2006 12:59:34 PM 767183 in reply to 766830

    Re: Movie Critic Corner

     Tybaltus wrote:
    So dont think Im upset that you said that ;)


    what makes you think I'd give a damn if you did get upset? ;)

    Don't worry tyb, just pulling your leg a bit, I used to watch a lot of films a few years ago too, I could see at least 2 films a week
    nowadays, I barely watch TV at all, only when I don't have anything to read / do on the computer
    (wow, I just made that sound worse, didn't I? ^^ )

    BORK!
Page 29 of 34 (504 items)   « First ... < Previous 27 28 29 30 31 Next > ... Last »
View as RSS news feed in XML
Powered by Community Server (Personal Edition), by Telligent Systems